Earlier this week, the New York Post reported that New York City’s schools chancellor, Richard Carranza, is contemplating a ban on flavored milk in the district’s school cafeterias. Advocates have cheered this news, while some of the city’s parents are apparently quite upset about it. The state’s dairy industry, which has been struggling in recent years, has also pushed back hard against the rumored proposal.
My own views on flavored milk in schools have evolved quite a bit over the years. For example, longtime TLT readers might remember my widely read* 2011 post called “My Problem with Jamie Oliver’s War on Flavored Milk,” in which I questioned the celebrity chef’s laser-like focus on banning flavored milk in the Los Angeles Unified School District, as part of his Food Revolution television show that year.
My main objection was that Oliver could have used his megaphone to highlight bigger problems in America’s school meal program. But I also defended flavored milk in its own right: Dairy provides children with protein, calcium, Vitamin A, Vitamin D and phosphorous, I wrote back then, and kids tend to like it more than other foods providing those same nutrients. And as I recounted in another TLT post (somewhat uncomfortably) endorsing flavored milk, this one published in 2010, I’d also been reassured by my kids’ pediatrician that milk’s nutritive benefits far outweighed a few grams of sugar.
These days, though, I am entirely supportive of efforts, like the rumored New York City proposal, to take flavored milk out of schools. The reasons behind my evolution are these:
First, the harms of excess sugar are by now well documented, including an increased risk of tooth decay, weight gain, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (even in those of normal weight). Second, we now have clear guidance from the American Heart Association on how much added sugar is too much for kids —no more than 25 grams, or 4 to 6 teaspoons, a day. Yet just one box of Horizon flavored milk would account for half that quota, and that’s on top all the other ways in which are our kids are deluged with added sugars: classroom treats, sugary school breakfasts, other sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit juice (experts regard its naturally occurring sugars as equally problematic), and sugar-sweetened savory foods like ketchup and salad dressing. Third, as many concerned school nutrition professionals have observed, kids will often fill up on flavored milk and spurn the rest of their school lunch— particularly when kids are given too little time to eat in the first place. And finally, there’s at least some evidence that some of the health claims for milk—which most of us have taken as gospel—are overstated.
For these reasons, several progressive districts around the country have already banned flavored milk, including Minneapolis, Washington, D.C., and Boulder.** But if you still need convincing, I urge you to read an excellent analysis of the possible New York City ban by reporter and advocate Andrea Strong, called “The Dark Side of Chocolate Milk in NYC Schools,” published yesterday by Hunter College’s Food Policy Center. As Strong reports, there are some shocking incongruities in the way New York City treats flavored milk in other contexts, such as its correctional facilities:
New York City’s Department of Corrections (DOC) has phased out sugar-sweetened beverages because of their ties to costly obesity-related diseases. Ten years ago DOC Commissioner Martin Horn told Gothamist, “the move will save money in the long run because healthier inmates will be less prone to strokes, heart attacks or diabetic shock on the city’s watch.” Today, the DOC bans both chocolate milk and juice. And yet, NYC’s Department of Education (DOE) continues to serve chocolate milk (and juice) to 1.1 million children a day.
Pretty eye-opening, no?
______
* When teachers want to stage classroom debates or teach argumentative writing, they try to find topics kids can relate to—like whether flavored milk should be in school cafeterias! Based on the crazy-high stats for my Jamie Oliver post and the information I can glean about who’s been looking at it, it’s apparently become a useful crib sheet for students assigned to the “pro” side of the debate. 😮
** Los Angeles did ban flavored milk in response to Jamie Oliver’s pressure, only to bring it back in 2016. The 180-degree shift was purportedly in response to significant waste of white milk, but as I argued in my 2016 post, the district could have simply told kids they didn’t have to take any milk at all.
Follow TLT on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, subscribe to Lunch Tray posts, and download my FREE 50-page guide, “How to Get Junk Food Out of Your Child’s Classroom.” You can also now pre-order my new book Kid Food: The Challenge of Feeding Children in a Highly Processed World —coming out this fall!
Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2019 Bettina Elias Siegel
Julie Revelant says
Bettina,
I completely agree with your perspective. Call me conservative, but sugar has no place in schools. Kids already have too much sugar in their diets. Proponents can argue that it gives them protein, vitamin D and calcium but the risks, in the context of the overall diet that most kids have, far outweigh any benefit. Instead, we need to offer healthy foods, teach healthy habits and offer healthy food in schools—then they won’t be deficient.
Kathi says
Full disclosure, I am an RDN and work in the dairy industry. Current chocolate milk in schools has about 6 g added sugar. It is not the same product on the shelf. Calcium and Vitamin D are 2 of the 4 nutrients of need, indicating the low nationwide consumption of these 2 essential nutrients is a public health concern. Children consume up to 60% of their nutrients at school.
We encourage parents to use dips to get their kids to eat veggies and most dips have NO nutritive value except calories, just like sugar.
Our dietary habits as kids are not the same as our dietary habits as adults. If they were, I would be eating bologna on Wonder bread every day and I now actually don’t eat meat.
So I am not sure why we would take away something so high in nutrition over 6 g of sugar.
Chris Goeb says
I am not part of the dairy industry, but Kathi’s comments are spot on. The natural sugars in white milk are already there. Milk is a very efficient delivery system for the nutrients that our general population is short on. As far as “health claims”of milk, set those aside because the nutritional facts themselves are enough to support serving flavored milk. Consumption of milk declines when only white is offered, (kid’s don’t just “learn to like it and accept it) and and because of that decline, families lose significant nutritional value from the school lunch they pay for.
Michelle C Discenza says
After reading The China Study, I no longer consider milk from a cow to be healthy at all. Children should be allowed to select water.
Bettina Elias Siegel says
I agree that water should be made more accessible than it currently is. Under the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, free potable water must be available in the cafeteria, but how this plays out in individual schools varies quite a bit. More on that here. Thank you for the comment!